AxonariBuild · Automate
The Axonari Blog

Who writes here.

Everything on this site is written by the partners who ship the work, not by a content desk.

How we write

Practitioners, not a content desk

Everything published here is written by someone who has shipped the kind of system it describes. That is a deliberate constraint rather than a boast: it means the guides are narrower than a research firm's, and it means the numbers in them came from delivery rather than from a survey.

Where a piece describes a workflow, assume we have built that workflow. Where it describes a failure, assume we have hit it.

Claims are sourced to the primary document

Regulatory and statistical claims link to the body that published them, not to a secondary article about it. NHS England rather than a trade write-up of NHS England. legislation.gov.uk rather than a law firm's summary. The ICO, FCA, SRA, FINRA, and the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations rather than an aggregator.

Pieces that carry that kind of claim end with a numbered source list, so you can check the reasoning rather than take the number on trust.

Regulation changes, so the pieces change

Compliance guidance ages badly. UK GDPR Article 22 was replaced by Articles 22A to 22D on 5 February 2026, which quietly invalidated a great deal of automation advice written before that date, including some of ours.

Articles carry a published date and, where they have been revised, a revision date. When the underlying rule moves, we update the piece rather than leaving it to rank on a stale claim.

What we will not publish

Numbers we cannot attribute. Vendor statistics repeated without a source. Predictions dressed as findings. Case study results that a client has not agreed we can print.

If a figure appears without a citation, it came from our own delivery data and the piece says so.

Found something wrong in a piece? Tell us and we will correct it and say so on the page.